ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-enabled privacy-preserving cardiac diagnostics via electrocardiograms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely available, non-invasive diagnostic tool used for cardiovascular screening and provides essential insights into heart rhythm, structure, and function. However, the high dimensionality of ECGs and their entanglement with demographic information pose challenges for building fair and privacy-preserving machine learning models. ECG signals inherently encode soft biometric attributes such as sex, age, and race, which may introduce bias and raise privacy concerns in data-sharing environments. To address these challenges, we propose a deep learning framework that learns clinically relevant ECG representations while suppressing sensitive demographic information. We leverage a variational autoencoder (VAE) with a dual-discriminator architecture. One adversarial branch reduces soft biometric encoding, while the other preserves clinically important discrimination of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The privacy-preserving reconstructed ECGs reduced identifiability of soft biometrics by independent CNN models with AUROC for sex 0.59 (from original 0.79), age 0.63 (from 0.78), and race 0.57 (from 0.69), while retaining clinically-useful predictions like reduced LVEF 0.82 (from 0.86), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) 0.72 (from 0.75), and 5-year mortality 0.67 (from 0.66). These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach for retaining ECG data yet protecting patient privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.