ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing landfill siting for small towns in developing countries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cities in developing countries often struggle to protect environmental quality and public health amid growing municipal solid waste pressures. Landfilling remains the dominant disposal option in resource-constrained settings, yet decisions on landfill locations are often made without systematic, science-based frameworks that adequately incorporate environmental, social, and ethical considerations. This study applies an integrated GIS–Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework to assess landfill site suitability in Chegutu, Zimbabwe, a rapidly urbanizing small town facing increasing waste management challenges. Multiple environmental, social, and geotechnical criteria were evaluated through structured pairwise comparisons and spatial overlay analysis, while acknowledging that additional considerations such as financial feasibility could further strengthen planning assessments. The results show that highly unsuitable areas dominate the town, accounting for approximately 85.6% of the total area, primarily due to proximity to built-up areas, incompatible land uses, and terrain-related constraints. Suitable and moderately suitable areas collectively represent about 14.1% of the landscape, while highly suitable land constitutes only about 0.3%, underscoring the severe spatial limitations for landfill development within the municipal boundary. The findings demonstrate that within the context of Chegutu Town, municipal-scale landfill self-sufficiency may be unrealistic, highlighting the need for regional waste management strategies and proactive land-use protection. The framework provides a locally relevant decision-support approach for evidence-based planning and contributes to broader discussions on responsible waste management in small towns across developing regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.