ArticleNature communications2026
Comparison and optimization of cellular neighbor preference methods for quantitative tissue analysis.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison and optimization of cellular neighbor preference methods for quantitative tissue analysis.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studying the spatial distribution of cell types in tissues is essential for understanding their function in health and disease. A widely applied measure in spatial omics analysis is the pairwise neighbor preference of cell types, indicating whether two cell types frequently occur in close proximity to each other. While various neighbor preference methods exist, there is no clear guidance for selecting one over another. Here we present a comprehensive comparison of existing neighbor preference analysis methods. We systematically evaluate the method's underlying analytical steps and introduce COZI, a combination of analysis steps not previously described. We compare results from existing methods and COZI with respect to their ability to distinguish distinct tissue architectures and to recover neighbor preference directionality using two tissue simulations and two biological datasets. Overall, we delineate method-specific strengths and limitations and demonstrate that COZI provides sensitive and directional neighbor preference analysis for quantification of spatial data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.