Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986357›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Comparison and optimization of cellular neighbor preference methods for quantitative tissue analysis.

Chiara Schiller, Miguel A Ibarra-Arellano, Kresimir Bestak, Jovan Tanevski, Denis Schapiro

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara SchillerInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-3771-2202
Miguel A Ibarra-ArellanoInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-4854
Kresimir BestakInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-8245-9846
Jovan TanevskiInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-1003
Denis SchapiroInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. denis.schapiro@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9391-5722

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology) 01ZZ2004Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Carl Zeiss Foundation) P2022-08-101Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) INST 35/1314-1 FUGG, INST 35/1503-1 FUGG and INST 35/1597-1 FUGG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the spatial distribution of cell types in tissues is essential for understanding their function in health and disease. A widely applied measure in spatial omics analysis is the pairwise neighbor preference of cell types, indicating whether two cell types frequently occur in close proximity to each other. While various neighbor preference methods exist, there is no clear guidance for selecting one over another. Here we present a comprehensive comparison of existing neighbor preference analysis methods. We systematically evaluate the method's underlying analytical steps and introduce COZI, a combination of analysis steps not previously described. We compare results from existing methods and COZI with respect to their ability to distinguish distinct tissue architectures and to recover neighbor preference directionality using two tissue simulations and two biological datasets. Overall, we delineate method-specific strengths and limitations and demonstrate that COZI provides sensitive and directional neighbor preference analysis for quantification of spatial data.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID41986357
PMCPMC13083810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.