Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Zhechang Gao *State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment/International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Ministry of Education (MOE) of China/College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Weile Ye *State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment/International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Ministry of Education (MOE) of China/College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunhong ZhouState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment/International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Ministry of Education (MOE) of China/College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhihua ZhengState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment/International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Ministry of Education (MOE) of China/College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Meiming SuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230001, China.
Yu HeDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuoming LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jaroslav PelisekExperimental Vascular Surgery/Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ke HeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. hiker00006@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-8408
Suowen XuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230001, China. sxu1984@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5488-5217
Jiaojiao WangState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment/International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Ministry of Education (MOE) of China/College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. jjwang89@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-7957
Zhiping LiuState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment/International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Ministry of Education (MOE) of China/College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. liuzhiping@jnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-6917
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82270500National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82370444
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Aortic aneurysm and dissection (AAD) are high-risk cardiovascular diseases with limited preventive pharmacotherapies based on angiotensin II receptor blockade. However, the underlying pathomechanisms of AAD are still unknown. Here, we find that glutamine transporters, particularly solute carrier family 1 member 5 (SLC1A5), in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from both patients and mice with AAD are significantly downregulated. VSMC-specific Slc1a5 deficiency exacerbates experimental AAD formation, with a marked increase in VSMC phenotypic switch and inflammation. Mechanistically, SLC1A5 preserves contractile phenotype by facilitating glutamine metabolite acetyl-CoA production and subsequent histone H3 lysine 9 and 27 acetylation, and ameliorates inflammation by promoting acetylated STAT3 mitochondrial translocation, hence inhibiting its nuclear translocation. Intriguingly, enforced SLC1A5 expression in VSMCs in vivo largely alleviates experimental AAD. These findings reveal a metabolic link between SLC1A5-driven glutamine transport and vascular homeostasis, suggesting SLC1A5 may be a promising therapeutic target for AAD.
Indexed as
Amino Acid Transport System ASCAortic AneurysmAortic DissectionEpigenesis, GeneticGlutamineMinor Histocompatibility AntigensMuscle, Smooth, VascularMyocytes, Smooth MuscleAcetylationAcetyl Coenzyme AAnimalsHistonesHomeostasisHumansMaleMiceAcetyl Coenzyme AAmino Acid Transport System ASCGlutamineHistonesMinor Histocompatibility AntigensSLC1A5 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription Factor
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
SLC1A5 prevents aortic aneurysm and dissection by glutaminolytic-epigenetic orchestration of vascular smooth muscle cell homeostasis. · full record | OpenQuestion