Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986341›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Meta-encoder: a unified integration framework for multiple pathological foundation models in cancer detection.

Ruitian Gao, Zhaochang Yang, Xin Yuan, Yifan Wang, Yujia Xia, Yufei Zhang, Bingyan Zheng, Yuqiao Gong, Yiping Yue, Yansong Tu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ruitian Gao *Institute of Clinical Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7499-607X
Zhaochang Yang *Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xin YuanInstitute of Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5293-003X
Yifan WangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yujia XiaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-2146
Yufei ZhangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Bingyan ZhengSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yuqiao GongDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1457-8308
Yiping YueDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yansong TuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhangsheng YuInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. yuzhangsheng@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-5330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of diverse pathological foundation models has empowered computational pathology tasks within the field of oncology, including tumor subtyping, cancer prognosis, biomarker prediction, gene expression prediction, and so on. However, variations in model architecture and data sources hinder consistent downstream performance and complicate centralized training. Specifically, the lack of data sharing makes retraining foundation models with pooled data infeasible. Here, we propose the Meta-Encoder, a unified framework that integrates features from multiple pathological foundation models to generate a comprehensive representation, achieving superior performance in downstream cancer detection tasks compared to single foundation models. While single models suffice for low-complexity univariate tasks such as cancer diagnosis and prognosis, the Meta-Encoder consistently rivals the best-performing single model, alleviating concerns over model selection. For high-dimensional tasks such as multiplex protein and gene expression prediction within tumor tissues, the attention-based strategies of our Meta-Encoder framework demonstrate substantial advantages over single models, offering an optimal balance of performance and efficiency. By harnessing the complementary strengths of multiple foundation models, the Meta-Encoder enhance the molecular characterization of pathology images, thereby advancing precision oncology.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyNeoplasmsAutoencoderBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID41986341
PMCPMC13323401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.