ArticleNature communications2026
Temporal-Spatial Fusion Vision Hardware Enables Streamlined In-Sensor Computing for Dynamic Scenes.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time and space constitute fundamental dimensions of physical reality, making their integrated processing crucial for advanced vision perception systems. Current visual information processing faces dual limitations: von Neumann architecture-induced data-transfer bottlenecks and spatial-feature processing often disregard temporal dynamics, while temporal analyzers oversimplify spatial complexity. Here we propose an artificial vision hardware enabling intrinsic temporal-spatial fusion through voltage-tunable temporal differentiation with microsecond-scale resolution and photoresponse-weighted spatial compression via pixel binning. The architecture achieves millisecond-level latency from sensing to decision in autonomous driving scenarios through in-sensor spatiotemporal fusion, eliminating external computing dependencies. Experimental validation demonstrates 95 % recognition accuracy in human actions database while the operation counts required is only 1/10 of conventional convolutional processing. This work facilitates physical-level spatiotemporal fusion through the co-optimization of photodetector arrays and weighted control circuits, which could fundamentally reshape machine vision architectures with potential extensions to real-time decision systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.