Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986316›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Histone diversity in the archaeal domain of life.

Shawn P Laursen, Karolin Luger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shawn P LaursenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-0763
Karolin LugerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. karolin.luger@colorado.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-5331

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-thirds of all archaea encode histones, proteins that are ubiquitously used to structure chromatin in eukaryotes. Archaeal histone sequences are less conserved than their eukaryotic counterparts, and insight into how they structure DNA is limited to a few species that fail to represent the archaeal domain. Here, we use bioinformatics, structure prediction, and molecular dynamics simulations to survey the diversity of histone-like sequences in archaeal genomes and to understand how they might interact with DNA. We identify five distinct types of histones that combine in seven strategies, involving either single histones, multiple histones of the same type, or combinations of types in each genome. Some strategies correlate with environmental pressures and some are phylogenetically restricted. Despite highly divergent sequences, structure predictions and simulations suggest similar histone-DNA binding modes for most strategies. Our work provides a guide to surverying diverse strategies for histone-based DNA organization in archaea.

Indexed as

ArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsHistonesAmino Acid SequenceDNA, ArchaealGenome, ArchaealMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhylogenyArchaeal ProteinsDNA, ArchaealHistones

Identifiers

PMID41986316
PMCPMC13260811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.