Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986314›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

A deep learning-based digital biopsy for predicting early recurrence in gastric cancer.

Ping'an Ding, Sheng Chen, Honghai Guo, Sen Yang, Xiyue Wang, Xiao Han, Jiaxuan Yang, Haotian Wu, Jiaxiang Wu, Yuan Tian and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01516944 (Perioperative Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium Capsule Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Patients With Localized Advanced Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01516944 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Perioperative Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium Capsule Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Patients With Localized Advanced Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHebei Medical UniversityRan2012 to 2018Enrolled749ConditionsGastric CancerArmsTegafur, Gimeracil and Oteracil Potassium Capsules;Oxaliplatin, Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ping'an Ding *The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. ding_ping_an@hebmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-0711
Sheng Chen *The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Honghai Guo *The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Sen Yang *Ant Group, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0639-4122
Xiyue WangCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-9090
Xiao HanCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5151-6547
Jiaxuan YangThe Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Haotian WuThe Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jiaxiang WuThe Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yuan TianThe Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Wenqian MaDepartment of Endoscopy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaolong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Baoding Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Zhenjiang GuoDepartment of General Surgery, Hengshui People's Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, China.
Renjun GuSchool of Chinese Medicine & School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Lilong ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ning MengDepartment of General Surgery, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yueping LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. liuyp@hebmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-114X
Lingjiao MengResearch Center and Tumor Research Institute of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. ljmeng@hebmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9316-8774
Qun ZhaoThe Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. zhaoqun@hebmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-3002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early postoperative recurrence is a major cause of treatment failure in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), yet current staging systems inadequately capture the biological heterogeneity that underlies recurrence risk. Here, we introduce a clinically interpretable multimodal prediction model, Recurrence Stratification and Assessment (RSA), which integrates deep learning-derived histopathological features from routine hematoxylin and eosin slides with conventional clinical variables. The model was developed using a retrospective multicenter cohort (n = 1,763) and rigorously validated across two internal cohorts, two geographically distinct external cohorts, and an exploratory post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial population (NCT01516944), demonstrating robust and generalizable performance (area under the curves ranging from 0.843 to 0.887). Shapley Additive Explanations-based interpretation identifies key histological features contributing to recurrence risk. To explore biological underpinnings, we perform transcriptomic sequencing and immune profiling on tumor specimens, revealing immune-enriched microenvironments and elevated checkpoint gene expression in the RSA-defined low-risk group. These findings suggest differential immunological activity may influence recurrence dynamics. This study demonstrates the application of digital pathology-based artificial intelligence for recurrence risk prediction in LAGC, offering not only a high-performance and biologically informed tool, but also a transparent framework for clinical deployment. The RSA model may support risk-adapted postoperative surveillance and provides a biologically informed framework for exploring the potential utility of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalStomach NeoplasmsBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41986314
PMCPMC13261139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.