Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986284›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of organic chemistry2026

Best Practices and Considerations for Applying Multiple Linear Regression in Organic Chemistry Research.

Austin LeSueur, Pauline Bianchi, Simone Gallarati, Sarah J Lefave, Matthew S Sigman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of organic chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Austin LeSueurDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.
Pauline BianchiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.
Simone GallaratiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2349-1944
Sarah J LefaveDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.
Matthew S SigmanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5746-8830

Funding

Data Science Guided Organic Reaction DevelopmentR35GM136271 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MATTHEW S SIGMAN · 2020 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Synopsis provides guidance for designing and executing Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) campaigns in organic chemistry. It outlines key steps of a robust workflow for accelerating reaction outcome prediction and maintaining interpretability, including data preparation, feature generation, data distribution analysis, model building, validation, and virtual screening. Emphasis is placed on defining a clear chemical objective and establishing mechanistic hypotheses. Representative examples illustrate how data size and distribution guide data splitting strategies and ratios, ultimately shaping model reliability and interpretability.

Identifiers

PMID41986284
PMCPMC13151527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.