Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986250›Full record

ArticleBehavior modification2026

Factors Associated With Restraint Application in Children and Adolescents With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Displaying Severe Challenging Behavior.

Asude Sumeyye Ayvaci, Alison Dorothea Cox, Daniel Mitteer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior modification, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asude Sumeyye AyvaciBrock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-4263-5821
Alison Dorothea CoxBrock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5396-6122
Daniel MitteerRutgers University Center for Autism Research, Somerset, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-0657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency physical restraints may still be widely used, with prevalence rates ranging from 11% to 78% across different service sectors (Fitton & Jones, 2020). At times, behavior analysts may recommend restraint when severe challenging behavior poses significant safety risks (e.g., intense aggression causing severe tissue damage; Foxx & Meindl, 2007; Vollmer et al., 2011). Most existing physical restraint literature featuring child and adolescent participants focuses on variables that behavior-analytic interventions do not manipulate (e.g., sex, diagnosis). Additionally, this literature most often features inpatient clinical populations with psychiatric conditions as opposed to those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The current study applied a multi-level analysis informed by retrospective outpatient data (

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesIntellectual DisabilityProblem BehaviorRestraint, PhysicalAdolescentAggressionChildFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Indexemergency physical restraintintellectual and developmental disabilityrestraint determinantssevere challenging behavior

Identifiers

PMID41986250
PMCPMC13424904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.