ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2026
Optic nerve intraneural pressure trend under intraocular-intracranial pressure effects.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The imbalance between intraocular pressure (IOP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) is a recognised contributor to optic nerve (ON) injury. Clinically, the translaminar pressure difference is often simplistically interpreted as the direct subtraction of ON cerebrospinal fluid pressure (ON - CSFp) from IOP. While finite element analyses suggest that the transition between these two pressure compartments is neither abrupt nor uniform, instead forming a spatially graded finite transition zone, this concept remains unconfirmed from a fluid dynamics perspective. Given the inability to directly measure intraneural pressure in vivo, we modelled the ON as a continuous fluid medium. Using a mathematical approach, we visually illustrate how IOP and ON-CSFp interact to generate spatially varying intraneural hydrostatic pressure gradients. Our results show that these gradients assume a three-dimensional conical configuration. Elevation of IOP or reduction of ON-CSFp expands this conical gradient field, contributing to ON injury, whereas elevation of ICP produces an inverted conical gradient. The steepest gradients occur in the peripheral region posterior to the lamina cribrosa, rendering this area most vulnerable to damage. This study challenges the clinical oversimplification that pressure difference is equivalent to a mere subtraction of two values. It thereby improves clinicians' understanding of the biomechanical mechanisms underlying IOP and ICP imbalance-related ON injury. Importantly, it also highlights the often-overlooked phenomenon of intraneural pressure gradients, extending beyond the conventional focus on the translaminar pressure gradient alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.