ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Comprehensive molecular characterization of cfDNA as predictive and monitoring biomarkers in advanced gastric cancer receiving immunotherapy.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced gastric cancer (aGC) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in response to combination immunotherapy. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) enables non-invasive profiling of tumor dynamics and may provide biomarkers for response prediction.
methodsWe enrolled 94 patients with aGC undergoing combination immunotherapy and assigned them to a discovery set (n=49) and an internal validation set (n=45). Plasma cfDNA was collected pre-treatment and post-treatment and profiled by low-pass whole-genome sequencing and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing in the discovery set, with targeted bisulfite sequencing used in the validation set.
resultsThe discovery set included 34 responders and 15 non-responders, and the validation set included 30 responders and 15 non-responders. We found that responders showed longer cfDNA, lower cfDNA tumor fraction (median: 0.06 vs 0.01, p<0.001), reduced chromosomal instability (median genomic instability index: 0.026 vs 0.007, p<0.001), and higher global methylation (median: 0.715 vs 0.724, p=0.007). Additionally, the differentially methylated region (DMR) at chr20:25849353-25849490 consistently showed higher methylation in responders in both the discovery (adjusted p=0.006) and validation sets (adjusted p=0.049). A predictor based on this DMR outperformed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) with area under the curve (AUCs) of 0.79 (discovery: 95% CI 0.65 to 0.93) and 0.72 (validation: 95% CI 0.54 to 0.91). When integrating PD-L1 CPS with this DMR, the AUCs were 0.81 (discovery: 95% CI 0.67 to 0.95) and 0.75 (validation: 95% CI 0.56 to 0.94), respectively. For on-treatment monitoring, three DMRs increased specifically in responders; among them, increased methylation of chr8:110479193-110480324 and chr8:50891437-50892120 was associated with improved progression-free survival (median: 4.90 vs 11.57 months, p<0.001; median: 5.20 vs 10.20 months, p=0.007).
conclusionIntegrated cfDNA profiling captures immunotherapy-associated molecular dynamics in aGC. A single pretreatment cfDNA methylation marker (chr20:25849353-25849490) improves response prediction beyond PD-L1 CPS and represents a potential predictive biomarker for combination immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.