ReviewBMJ open respiratory research2026
Personalised management of community-acquired pneumonia and the role of Clinical Decision Support Software.
Review in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating alpha-1 antitrypsin and its c-terminal peptides differentiate bacterial from viral community-acquired pneumonia.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common causes of hospital admission and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. National and international guidelines are available to guide the management of CAP, including antibiotic prescribing. However, these guidelines are often not adhered to and there is significant overprescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics, contributing to the growing pandemic of antimicrobial resistance. Clinical Decision Support Software (CDSS) are electronic tools that use individual patient data to generate patient specific assessments or recommendations, that can then be acted on by the patient or clinical decision maker. This article reviews the evidence surrounding the initial management of CAP in hospital and considers the potential of CDSS to support CAP management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.