ArticleBMJ open2026
Effects of modified site for radial artery cannulation on the stability of arterial blood pressure monitoring in patients undergoing elective surgery (MoSRAC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06566456 (The Impact of Modified Site for Radial Artery Cannulation on the Stability of Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of Modified Site for Radial Artery Cannulation on the Stability of Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInvasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is critical for perioperative and critically ill patients, yet traditional radial artery cannulation near the wrist joint is prone to catheter dysfunction (eg, kinking, occlusion) due to positional changes, compromising accuracy and patient safety. This trial hypothesises that modifying the cannulation site to 1.5-2.5 cm proximal to the radial styloid process may enhance catheter stability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, analyst-blinded trial. A total of 486 participants (243 per group) will be enrolled at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Eligible patients (18-75 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, requiring elective surgery with radial artery cannulation) will be randomised 1:1 to the modified group (1.5-2.5 cm proximal to the radial styloid process) or the conventional group (traditional site). The primary outcome is the incidence of arterial catheter dysfunction (defined by criteria such as blood sampling difficulty, position-dependent waveform or improved waveform post-square wave test). Secondary outcomes include frequency of catheter dysfunction, damping abnormality rate, first-puncture success rate, number of arterial punctures, arterial cannulation time, complication incidence and blood pressure measurement differences. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol (V.4.0) was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, China on 2 September 2025. The first participant was recruited on 15 September 2025, with an estimated completion date of 31 December 2025. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06566456.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.