ArticleBMJ open2026
Detection of fetal malnutrition at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score and anthropometric indices and its associated risk factors among term newborns in southern Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of fetal malnutrition (FM) among term singleton newborns at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score. The study also compared the CAN score with selected anthropometric indices to describe their ability to identify FM. Furthermore, it sought to identify maternal and neonatal factors linked with FM among term infants delivered in four public hospitals in South Ethiopia.
designCross-sectional study.
settingThe study was conducted at four public hospitals in South Ethiopia Regional State.
participants480 live-born full-term babies and their mothers delivered at four public hospitals between 6 June 2021 and 19 April 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: FM status at birth was the outcome variable. FM was assessed using both the CAN score and selected anthropometric indices. At birth, measurements of height, weight, head circumference (HC) and mid-arm circumference (MAC) were taken. The MAC/HC ratio, body mass index (BMI) and ponderal index (PI) were computed and contrasted with reference curves. By examining and calculating subcutaneous tissue and muscle loss, the CAN score was used to determine the newborn's CAN status. A CAN score of <25 was considered FM.
resultsThis study of 480 newborns found varying rates of FM depending on the diagnostic criteria used. The prevalence of FM was highest when assessed by CAN score (26.04%), followed by PI (17.29%), BMI (16.25%), MAC/HC ratio (13.54%) and birth size-for-gestational-age (11.25%). Not attending formal education (AOR 3.31 95% CI 1.14 to 9.64), age between 25-29 years (AOR 2.66 95% CI 1.19 to 5.98), primi-parity (AOR 9.63 95% CI 1.42 to 65.46), having <= two antenatal clinic (ANC) visits (AOR 2.34 95% CI 1.05 to 5.24) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) (AOR 16.99 95% CI 4.20 to 68.81) were maternal factors significantly associated with increased risk of FM.
conclusionsFM was prevalent among term neonates, with the CAN score showing higher prevalence than anthropometric indices. Education level of the mother, primi-parity, fewer ANC visits, maternal age between 25-29 years and PIH were significant risk factors. FM might be most effectively recognised using the CAN score, which can be done without advanced tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.