ArticleBMJ open2026
Effects of pronatal policies on sexual and reproductive health services: a protocol for a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the context of declining total fertility rates, many governments are seeking the optimal blend of policy interventions to encourage childbirth. Scholars have mapped how pronatal policy agendas are shaping social policies, yet there has been less attention on how such agendas shape health policies. This review will map and synthesize the evidence on how pronatal policies affect sexual and reproductive healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted using two searches. One search will identify relevant peer-reviewed papers in Medline, EMBASE, social policy and practice, global health and Web of Science databases. A second search will identify relevant grey literature from Overton and Policy Commons databases. Sources will be managed using Rayaan software and studies selected based on specified inclusion criteria. Data will be extracted using a customised extraction form, mapped and subsequently synthesised using narrative approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed manuscript and conference presentations. Ethics and patient engagement are not required for a scoping review. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251156155.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.