ReviewRedox biology2026
Oxidative stress biomarkers in assisted reproductive technologies: From follicular redox biology to clinical translation.
Review in Redox biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effects of oral antioxidants on outcomes of assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- From subclinical ovarian damage to reproductive outcomes: a translational perspective on PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Stage-dependent DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction under simulated microgravity constrain oocyte maturation and are mitigated by melatonin.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- BMI and idiopathic infertility drive polarized redox phenotypes in human follicular fluid.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important regulators within the ovarian follicle microenvironment and are increasingly recognized as mediators of impaired oocyte competence in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Beyond established factors such as aging, metabolic imbalance, and environmental exposures, redox dysregulation within the follicle may contribute to variability in ART outcomes that is not explained by conventional morphological assessment. ROS are generated across multiple subcellular compartments, including mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, lysosomes, plasma membrane, and peroxisomes. Their compartmentalized production, together with localized antioxidant defenses, creates spatially confined redox microdomains that regulate follicular physiological activity. Disruption of this finely tuned redox balance within the follicle may result in oxidative damage affecting oocytes. Identifying oxidative stress-related biomarkers within the follicle has therefore become an attractive non-invasive approach to infer oocyte competence, as these markers may reflect integrated redox dynamics. However, accurate quantification of ROS remains challenging due to their short half-life and subcellular confinement. Most current approaches rely on measuring stable oxidative by-products or antioxidant capacity in follicular fluid or granulosa cells. However, such markers may not accurately capture follicle-specific or compartment-specific redox status, and many oxidative modifications do not directly indicate functional impairment. Although numerous biomarkers have been associated with ART outcomes, methodological heterogeneity and limited biological resolution restrict their clinical translation. Further studies using standardized methodologies and higher-resolution measurements are required to clarify their prognostic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.