ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Prediction of minimum inhibitory concentration of antibacterial peptides using geometric graph networks and dynamic loss functions.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance has reduced the effectiveness of traditional antibiotics for public health needs. Antibacterial peptides (ABPs) hold clinical value due to their inherent antimicrobial activity and resistance to degradation. Existing deep learning approaches for predicting the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ABPs typically rely on a single modality or a single scale, limiting their ability to capture ABP complexity. Moreover, these methods cover only a narrow range of bacterial species. To address these challenges, we propose the geometric graph network (GGN)-ABPMIC model, which integrates multi-scale structural features at the atomic and residue scales with peptide sequence features. These features are aggregated through a GGN enhanced with geometric vector perceptrons. To enrich the feature representation, we also incorporate descriptors that quantify the physicochemical properties of ABPs and fuse them with the GGN-processed features. The model predicts the MIC values for ABPs across datasets spanning 10 bacterial species. For training and robustness, we introduce a multi-stage dynamic-weight hybrid loss that combines mean-squared error (MSE), the Huber loss, and a contrastive learning loss. Across the 10 species, GGN-ABPMIC achieves a mean MSE of 0.221, a mean R$^2$ of 0.564, and a mean Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.749, outperforming existing approaches. Additional validate via case studies on supplementary Escherichia coli ABP sequences indicates that the MIC predictions of GGN-ABPMIC are closer to the true values, demonstrating strong predictive performance and generalization for ABP activity. The data and codes for GGN-ABPMIC are available at https://github.com/LiJinYu1231/GGN-ABPMIC/tree/master.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.