ArticleCritical care explorations2026
Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation After Cardiac Arrest Due to Refractory Anaphylaxis From Nut Ingestion.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSevere anaphylaxis can cause vasoplegia, decreased cardiac output, bronchoconstriction, and acute pulmonary edema, leading to cardiopulmonary arrest. In evaluating these patients for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), it is important to determine the principal factor underlying the patient's failure of medical management. In this case, we describe the successful use of venovenous ECMO in a pediatric patient with anaphylactic shock and cardiac arrest. CASE SUMMARY: A 15-year-old male presented after anaphylaxis leading to a 45-minute cardiac arrest. Although return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved while preparing for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, he had profound hypoxic respiratory failure from pulmonary edema with an oxygenation index of 45, and he required vasoactive support with epinephrine and norepinephrine. With signs of adequate perfusion and an improving pulse pressure gradient from 10 to 30, a rapid decision was made to change the cannulation strategy from venoarterial to venovenous ECMO. He was decannulated 3 days later with resolution of his acute respiratory failure, extubated 5 days later, and discharged home neurologically intact 12 days later.
conclusionsThe periarrest decision to modify the cannulation strategy demonstrates that, even after prolonged cardiac arrest and ROSC, venovenous ECMO can be a safe, potential bridge to the resolution of pulmonary edema, with careful consideration of individual patient characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.