Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984978›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Cell type-agnostic transcriptomic signatures enable uniform comparisons of neural maturation.

Sridevi Venkatesan, Jonathan M Werner, Yun Li, Jesse Gillis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sridevi VenkatesanDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9175-7161
Jonathan M WernerTerrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Yun LiDevelopmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Jesse GillisDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-9774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding where a cell sits along developmental time is as important as identifying its type. While single-cell transcriptomics has catalogued the diversity of neural cell types, aligning them along a shared temporal axis across studies, species, and model systems remains a fundamental challenge. Here, we develop a single-cell transcriptomic 'clock' that predicts true developmental age, enabling standardized, cross-context comparisons of neural maturation. Through a meta-analysis of over 2.8 million cells from the developing human brain, we identify robust tissue-level and cell-autonomous predictors of developmental age. We find that bulk tissue composition predicts age within individual studies but lacks generalizability, whereas specific cell type proportions, particularly astrocytes and progenitors, track age reliably across studies. Using machine learning, we develop a cell type-agnostic predictor based on 462 genes that robustly tracks developmental dynamics across diverse cell types and datasets (error = 2.6 weeks). Our model accurately estimates developmental age in human neural organoids and detects disease-associated shifts. Model predictions further generalize across species, revealing 10-fold accelerated neurodevelopment in mice relative to humans. Our approach provides a robust framework to assess neural maturation across contexts, with broad relevance for developmental biology and disease modeling.

Indexed as

NeurogenesisNeuronsTranscriptomeAnimalsAstrocytesBrainGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansMachine LearningMiceNeurodevelopmentSingle-Cell AnalysisSingle-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41984978
PMCPMC13095120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.