Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984974›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2026

Oocyte vitrification disrupts zygotic genome activation in embryos by impairing maternal spliceosome translation and Crxos splicing.

Jianpeng Qin, Ao Ning, Jian Han, Xiangyi Chen, Beijia Cao, Yujun Yao, Xiaoqing He, Bo Pan, Yaozong Wei, Kunlin Du and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jianpeng QinState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-9776
Ao NingState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3979-5184
Jian HanCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Peking University Third Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China.
Xiangyi ChenState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Beijia CaoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yujun YaoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Peking University Third Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqing HeCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Peking University Third Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China.
Bo PanState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yaozong WeiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7509-2132
Kunlin DuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Shuqi ZouState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7922-4305
Jiangfeng YeState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Guozhi YuCollege of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4319-3661
Qiuxia LiangCollege of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, China.
Jie QiaoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Peking University Third Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China.
Jie YanCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Peking University Third Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China.
Guangbin ZhouState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multiomics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4493-8311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oocyte vitrification is indispensable in assisted reproduction, yet its link to compromised embryonic development remains mechanistically unresolved. Here, this study demonstrate through integrated transcriptome and translatome analysis that vitrification disrupts maternal mRNA translation-sparing global transcriptional output-in mouse oocytes. This translational perturbation prominently suppresses genes encoding spliceosome components, including Phf5a, leading to persistent and widespread alternative splicing defects in subsequent 2-cell embryos. Importantly, aberrant splicing specifically depletes the functional full-length transcript of the essential zygotic genome activation (ZGA) regulator Crxos (Egam1) while elevating a truncated, non-functional variant (Egam1ΔEXON3). Functional analyses confirm that loss of Crxos in 2‑cell embryos not only compromises developmental progression but also reduces global transcriptional activity, likely via impaired RNA Pol II recruitment and elongation at ZGA genes. Together, this work delineates a linear pathological cascade triggered by oocyte vitrification, comprising maternal translational suppression, spliceosome impairment, Crxos aberrant splicing, impaired ZGA, and developmental compromise, thereby offering a mechanistic basis for refining cryopreservation protocols in reproductive medicine.

Indexed as

OocytesSpliceosomesZygoteAlternative SplicingAnimalsCryopreservationEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceProtein BiosynthesisRNA SplicingVitrification

Identifiers

PMID41984974
PMCPMC13095128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.