Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984958›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Observational constraints project a ~50% AMOC weakening by the end of this century.

Valentin Portmann, Didier Swingedouw, Omar Khattab, Marie Chavent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valentin PortmannEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0009-0009-7222-690X
Didier SwingedouwEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-0850
Omar KhattabEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux, France.
Marie ChaventIMB, UMR 5251, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INRIA, Bordeaux INP, Talence, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6774-597X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate models show considerable discrepancies in their future projections around the Atlantic, mainly due to uncertainties in the fate of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Climate models suggest a reduction in AMOC strength of 32 ± 37% by 2100 (90% probability, Shared Socioeconomic Pathways 2-4.5 scenario, Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6). To refine this estimate and reduce its uncertainty, we use four different observational constraint methods. The best one, which provides the lowest leave-one-out error, integrates a large set of observable variables using ridge-regularized linear regression-a method unusual in climate science. It gives an estimate of the AMOC slowdown of 51 ± 8% (90% probability), i.e., a weakening ∼ 60% stronger than suggested by the multimodel mean. This refinement mainly results from correcting a bias in South Atlantic surface salinity, consistent with recent studies emphasizing its role in the proximity to an AMOC tipping point. This more substantial AMOC weakening has key implications for future adaptation strategies.

Identifiers

PMID41984958
PMCPMC13082334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.