ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
How the visual brain can learn to parse images using a multiscale, incremental grouping process.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A model of thalamo-cortical interaction for incremental binding in mental contour-tracing.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural scenes usually contain many objects that need to be segregated from each other and the background. Object-based attention is the process that groups image fragments belonging to the same objects. Curve-tracing tasks provide a special case, testing our ability to group image elements of an elongated curve. In the brain, curve-tracing is associated with the gradual spread of enhanced neuronal activity over the representation of the traced curve. Previous studies demonstrated that the tracing speed is higher if curves are far apart than if they are nearby. One hypothesis is that a larger distance between curves permits activity propagation in higher visual cortical areas. In these higher areas receptive fields are larger and connections exist between neurons representing image regions that are farther apart (Pooresmaeili et al., 2014). We propose a recurrent architecture for the scale-invariant tracing of curves and objects. The architecture is composed of a feedforward pathway that dynamically selects the appropriate scale for tracing, and a recurrent pathway for propagating enhanced neuronal activity through horizontal and feedback connections, enabled by a disinhibitory loop involving VIP and SOM interneurons. We trained the network using a biologically plausible reinforcement learning scheme and observed that training on short curves allowed the networks to generalize to longer curves and 2D-objects. The network chose the scale based on the distance between curves and the width of objects, just as in human psychophysics and the visual cortex of monkeys. The results provide a mechanistic account of the learning and execution of multiscale perceptual grouping in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.