Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984923›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Usability of iSupport Swiss, a World Health Organization Digital Intervention for Caregivers of People With Dementia: Mixed Methods Study.

Anna Messina, Rebecca Amati, Anna Maria Annoni, Emiliano Albanese, Maddalena Fiordelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Messina *Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland, 41 0782104055.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8724-3547
Rebecca Amati *Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland, 41 0782104055.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-9071
Anna Maria Annoni *Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland, 41 0782104055.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4249-0231
Emiliano Albanese *Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland, 41 0782104055.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-8530
Maddalena Fiordelli *Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Buffi 13, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland, 41 0782104055.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9775-0219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dementia presents a pressing public health challenge, with informal caregivers (ICs) playing a pivotal role in supporting people with dementia. Digital interventions, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) iSupport, offer scalable, self-guided psychosocial and educational support for caregivers. However, effective implementation relies on strong usability, particularly for older adults with varying levels of digital literacy. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the desktop version of iSupport Swiss, a WHO culturally adapted digital intervention for ICs of people with dementia in the Italian-speaking region of Switzerland. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods usability study at the Università della Svizzera italiana. Participants (formal caregivers and ICs) completed a pretest questionnaire to collect sociodemographic data and digital health literacy measures via the Italian version of the eHealth Literacy Scale, 11 structured usability tasks, a posttest System Usability Scale, and a semistructured interview. Task performance was observed and analyzed, including completion rates and qualitative feedback obtained through the think-aloud technique. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Twelve caregivers (10 ICs and 2 formal caregivers) took part in the study. Most participants showed high digital proficiency (Italian version of the eHealth Literacy Scale: mean 31.17, SD 5.84) and completed most tasks successfully or with minimal support. The mean System Usability Scale score was 71.5 (SD 12.27), indicating good usability. Website features were rated positively, especially information quality (mean 4.58/5, SD 0.51) and quantity (mean 4.42/5, SD 0.51), though ease of navigation scored lower (mean 3.42/5, SD 1.00). Qualitative interviews revealed 5 core dimensions: content quality and relevance, credibility of the source, navigation and usability, interactivity, and emotional impact. Suggestions included clearer language switching, improved navigation cues, and more personalized feedback in exercises. Conclusions: iSupport Swiss demonstrated overall good usability among caregivers, supporting its further implementation. Key areas for refinement include navigation clarity and user-tailored feedback. Participants appreciated the emotional resonance and credibility of the program, underlining its potential to enhance caregiver self-efficacy and early help-seeking. Usability testing proved essential in identifying both functional and affective dimensions of user experience. Future work should extend to broader and more diverse populations, incorporate real-world usage settings, and examine long-term engagement to optimize adoption and impact. Successful use and further development of iSupport, beyond the specific Swiss context, could contribute to expanding the availability of accessible and appropriate resources for ICs, ultimately helping to reduce caregiver burden and alleviate its impact on social and health care systems globally.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaAgedDigital HealthFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandWorld Health OrganizationcaregiverdementiaeHealthpsychosocial interventionsusability

Identifiers

PMID41984923
PMCPMC13082442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.