ArticlePloS one2026
An algorithm to identify less invasive surfactant administration using a real-world database of preterm infants.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurfactant replacement therapy is central to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) management in preterm infants, which can be delivered using a variety of methods. Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) has been increasingly adopted due to its association with improved neonatal outcomes. However, there are no procedure codes to identify LISA in large real-world data (RWD), limiting the ability to evaluate its use and effectiveness on a large scale. This study aimed to develop an algorithm to identify LISA procedures using administrative data.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study using chart reviews as the gold standard to identify preterm infants receiving surfactant via LISA or non-LISA procedures across Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) facilities. We selected 82 candidate variables from administrative data between birth and date of first surfactant administration. The algorithm was developed using births between 2019 and 2023, which were randomly split into a training set (n = 884) and testing set (n = 379). A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for variable selection and model fitting. Model discrimination was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Algorithm performance was validated using a combined sample of the testing set and a 2024 birth cohort (n = 622) overall and by gestational age (GA) using sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
resultsAmong 1,263 preterm infants who received surfactant, 462 (36.6%) received surfactant via LISA and 801 (63.4%) received surfactant via invasive modalities (ETT or INSURE). The LASSO-based model selected 21 variables predictive of LISA methods based on the training set. The model demonstrated strong discrimination (AUROC = 0.87). Using the maximum specificity cut-point (predicted probability ≥0.79), the model achieved Sn = 43.9%, Sp = 96.8%, PPV = 90.0% and NPV = 72.5%, with an overall agreement of 75.9% when evaluated in the combined testing set and 2024 birth cohort. Sn and Sp were consistent across GA subgroups.
conclusionsWe used a machine-learning approach to develop an algorithm that performed well in identifying surfactant administered via LISA among preterm infants using administrative data. The algorithm demonstrated strong performance and can support future research to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of LISA using RWD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.