Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984906›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Spatial and temporal patterns of SARS-CoV-2 infection in uMgungundlovu, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Radiya Gangat, Veranyuy Ngah, Rushambwa Tawonga, Justine I Blanford, Jabulani Ronnie Ncayiyana, Peter Suwirakwenda Nyasulu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Radiya GangatDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Veranyuy NgahDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Rushambwa TawongaSchool of Development Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Justine I BlanfordDepartment of Earth Observation Science (EOS), Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Jabulani Ronnie NcayiyanaDivision of Health Measurement Sciences, School of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Peter Suwirakwenda NyasuluDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-0663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvestigating the spatial distribution of SARS-CoV-2 at a local level and describing the pattern of disease occurrence can be used as the basis for efficient prevention and control measures. This research project aims to utilize geospatial analysis to understand the distribution patterns of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its relationship with certain co-existing factors in uMgungundlovu district, KwaZulu-Natal.

methodsSpatial characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 were investigated over the first four waves of transmission using ESRI ArcGIS Pro v2.0, including Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) with Moran's "I" as the measure of spatial autocorrelation; and Kernel Density Estimation (KDE). In implementing temporal analysis, time series analysis using the Python Seaborn library was used, with separate modelling carried out for each wave.

resultsStatistically significant SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates were noted across age groups with p-values = 0.0000. Statistically significant clustering was evident in wave 1 and wave 3 (Moran's I respectively: wave 1-0.096; wave 2-0.023; wave 3-0.039; wave 4-0.023). The KDE (Highest density of cases: wave 1: 25.0001-50.0, wave 2: 25.0001-50.0, wave 3: 100.001-150.0, wave 4: 50.0001-100.0). Temporal analysis showed more fluctuation at the beginning of each wave with less fluctuation in daily identified cases within the middle to end of each wave.

conclusionA Geospatial approach of analysing infectious disease transmission is proposed to guide control efforts (e.g., testing/tracing and vaccine rollout) for populations at higher vulnerability. Additionally, the nature and configuration of the social and built environment may be associated with increased infection. However, locally specific empirical research is required to assess other relevant factors associated with increased infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansIncidencePandemicsSARS-CoV-2South AfricaSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41984906
PMCPMC13082583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.