ArticlePloS one2026
Perspectives of women, healthcare providers and health managers on Group Antenatal Care implementation in Geita, Tanzania: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmong the root causes of high maternal and neonatal mortality is low utilization of antenatal care (ANC) services and sub-optimal quality of care during pregnancy. Group Antenatal Care (G-ANC) is an innovative model of care where pregnant women with similar gestational age (GA) meet for their antenatal care visits as a group, rather than individually. This approach promotes peer support, shared learning, and a sense of community among pregnant women, and enhance the quality of care. This study aimed to assess the perspectives of healthcare providers (HCPs), women and health managers to determine the experience and acceptability of G-ANC in low resource settings.
methodsThe project was implemented from February 2023 to June 2024. However, participant recruitment for the qualitative component commenced in June to September 2024. Data was collected through six Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with pregnant women and postnatal women who had recently attended G-ANC sessions. Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were conducted with HCPs, facility leaders (in-charge) and district / regional health managers. Respondents were selected through purposive sampling, and discussions were conducted using semi-structured interview guides. Audio recorded interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was conducted using NVIVO software.
resultsFindings revealed positive experience, satisfaction and acceptability of G-among women and HCPs. Women reported increased knowledge on maternal health, emotional support, and enhanced communication with HCPs. Healthcare providers highlighted improved efficiency, better patient engagement, and peer support among clients. Health managers demonstrated contribution of G-ANC in promoting increased ANC attendance and more interactive care. However, challenges such as limited space, need for facilitator training, and resource constraints were identified.
conclusionGroup Antenatal Care demonstrated significant benefits for maternal health education, peer support, and healthcare delivery efficiency. These findings add evidence to other existing literature supporting the adoption of this intervention in low resource settings. However, successful implementation requires investments in infrastructure (space for G-ANC meetings), adequate and trained HCPs, service integration and male engagement. Institutionalizing G-ANC as a standard antenatal care could be the best option to address the low coverage of ANC visits, suboptimal quality care, and promotion of institutional deliveries in low resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.