ArticlePloS one2026
Occupational risk factors for depression and anxiety symptoms: Insights from a large cohort study during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAn increased risk for an occupation-related SARS-CoV-2 infection has been linked to higher psychological distress. This online survey investigates the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in a large sample of 34,303 participants from the German cohort for digital health research (DigiHero) after the pandemic (late 2023, t1) and retrospectively from the Omicron wave (early 2022, t0), emphasizing variations across occupational groups and work-related risk factors.
methodsParticipants reported their employment status (currently working; seeking employment; not working). Workers provided their primary occupation to assess occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk. Symptoms of depression and anxiety (assessed via PHQ-4) and additional occupational risk factors were solicited for each time point. Associations between occupational exposure and stressors with the four-level PHQ-4 outcome were analyzed separately for t1 and t0 using ordinal regression and expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsOver 60% of respondents were working at t1, and 1.4% classified themselves as seeking a job. Job seekers reported highest and non-working individuals lowest depressive and anxiety symptoms. Symptom severity varied by occupation with elevated odds in traffic/logistics professions exclusively at t1 (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48) and healthcare professions exclusively at t0 (OR=1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16). High occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was linked to symptoms at t0. Overall, these associations were modest and partly attenuated after additional adjustment for individual work-related stressors (e.g., loneliness at work, chronic work-related stress, work-privacy conflicts). At both timepoints, individual stressors and sociodemographic factors showed stronger associations with severe symptoms than occupation (e.g., chronic work-related stress at t1 OR=2.87, 95% CI 2.70-3.04).
conclusionsPersistent post-pandemic depressive and anxiety symptoms among workers emphasize the importance of addressing individual psychosocial work-related stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.