ArticlePloS one2026
Development and validation of prediction models for predicting social care strengths and vulnerability in older people: Cohort study using routine data in Adult Social Care.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Adult Social Care, UK local authorities have statutory responsibilities for assessing needs and delivering services to ensure adults' wellbeing. Administrative data collected during this process may help local authorities' compliance with these duties. We developed and internally validated predictive models for older people (>- 60 years) receiving social care for whether they remained at home or were admitted to care homes, two years after index assessments, using administrative data from one English City authority. We enquired whether the right data, to predict older people's vulnerability to adverse outcome (care home) or evidence their strengths (remaining at home), were present in local authority systems, and if accurate datasets for large numbers of older people could be constructed to allow robust modelling. Logistic regression models were created with binary outcome (remaining at home/entering care homes). Sample size calculations determined the maximum number of candidate predictors we could consider for model development. 20,218 older people in the data cohort indicated we could consider a maximum of 46 candidate predictor parameters. In our final analyses we considered 31 candidate predictor parameters, in the areas of: age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, housing tenure, abilities in activities of daily living, access to carer, Primary Support Reason, diagnosis of dementia. We used all data for model development and internal validation using cross-validation. Models were robust as to assumptions, with no evidence of overfitting and good predictive accuracy. Circumstances predicting strongly that older people would not remain at home were that they were: from other (non-white) ethnic groups, privately rented tenants or other (unstable) tenancies, not able to eat or keep their home habitable without difficulty, with their Primary Support Reason for personal care, mental health, or support with cognition. With public involvement partners, we created a prototype index for local authority use to inform professional decisions and/or local planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.