ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
After-Hours Use of the Electronic Health Record Among Medical and Surgical Specialists After Implementation of a System-Wide Integrated Clinical Information System in Alberta, Canada: Longitudinal Descriptive Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies suggest that the introduction of electronic health records (EHRs) has decreased the efficiency of clinical practice and increased clinician workload for US-based physicians. Most studies involve clinicians in primary care settings. Less is known about other health care settings, subspecialist clinicians, or whether markers of efficiency and workload change over time. Objective: This study aimed to describe 2 common metrics of after-hours use of the EHR (pajama time and time outside scheduled hours [TOSH]) among diverse specialists and track these parameters longitudinally in a Canadian setting. Methods: In this longitudinal descriptive study, medical and surgical specialists were observed starting from the introduction of a system-wide EHR in 2019 to 2022 at a large quaternary teaching hospital in Edmonton, Alberta. Pajama time and TOSH were extracted from the EHR on an Epic system platform and monitored over time. Clinicians were stratified according to clinical group (medical and surgical) and workload (clinical full-time equivalent). Results: A total of 71 medical and surgical specialists participated in this study, spending approximately 24 to 40 minutes per day on pajama time and 32 to 55 minutes per day on TOSH depending on clinician grouping. Both metrics increased over the observation period, as reflected in the longitudinal plots and the higher values observed at the end vs the beginning of follow-up. Conclusions: After-hours EHR use in this Canadian cohort of medical and surgical specialists was similar to what is reported in the US literature, although the drivers may be different. Perhaps surprisingly, these markers increased over time despite presumed improved familiarity with the EHR. The extent to which this affects clinician well-being and work-life integration cannot be determined from these results, although there may be cause for concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.