Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984813›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Male allyship to advance women's leadership in global health academia: A qualitative study.

Amanda Marr Chung, Ola Alani, Michele Barry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda Marr ChungStanford Center for Innovation in Global Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4443-9616
Ola AlaniStanford Center for Innovation in Global Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-9165
Michele BarryStanford Center for Innovation in Global Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women are underrepresented in leadership positions within global health. Although women leaders have been shown to foster inclusive work environments and prioritize improvements in women's health, they face barriers to their advancement, including microaggressions and disproportionate caregiving responsibilities. Male allyship can facilitate the elevation of women into global health leadership roles. This study explores the experiences of global health leaders in academia of male allyship and identifies actions and best practices to support the growth of women's leadership in global health. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-one global health leaders (11 females, 10 males) from U.S. and Canadian academic institutions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using a combined inductive-deductive approach. Participants identified barriers and outlined potential approaches to support women's advancement to leadership roles. For the individual male ally, recommendations included completing a self-assessment (to mitigate counterproductive behaviors and biases), engaging in effective mentorship practices, advocating publicly, and serving as a positive role model. Recommendations at the institutional level emphasize the importance of cultivating an enabling environment that facilitates open dialogue, establishing goals and metrics; and implementing allyship training with periodic evaluation. At the societal level, participants suggested promoting early education and shared caregiving to shift cultural norms on gender roles. This paper provides a framework of actions and resources to cultivate and support male allyship for women's leadership advancement in global health. Effective male allyship begins with acknowledging power dynamics and an understanding of how intersectionality, beyond gender alone, shapes women's careers and workplace dynamics. Additionally, mentorship and collaborative peer support are critical to promoting women's career development. Individual allyship when combined with institutional and societal actions and policies, can facilitate the advancement of women in global health leadership roles.

Identifiers

PMID41984813
PMCPMC13082618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.