Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984800›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Gene regulation in response to host sex and infection route in Brugia pahangi with new genome annotation.

Christopher I Holt, Robin E Bromley, Benjamin C Sparklin, John Mattick, Jeremy M Foster, Michelle L Michalski, Julie C Dunning Hotopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher I HoltInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0326-2052
Robin E BromleyInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-2603
Benjamin C SparklinInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5547-185X
John MattickInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8743-1158
Jeremy M FosterBiochemistry and Microbiology Division, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA 01938, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5107-6513
Michelle L MichalskiDepartment of Biology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI 54901, United States.
Julie C Dunning HotoppInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3862-986X

Funding

HHS T32AI162579HHS U19AI110820National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male rodents are almost exclusively used for experimental maintenance of filarial nematodes because they have higher susceptibility to parasitism than female rodents. This study investigates the effects that rodent host sex has on the worm transcriptome for subcutaneous (SQ) infections and intraperitoneal (IP) infections. Significantly more adult worms were recovered from IP-infected gerbils (median = 78 worms/infected animal) relative to SQ-infected gerbils (median = 2 worms/infected animal). Microfilaria production in male gerbils infected via the SQ route (mean = 6.62 microfilariae (mf)/20 µL, median = 5.65 mf/20 µL) was significantly greater than in female gerbils (mean = 0.43 mf/20 µL, median = 0 mf/20 µL). Male gerbils were also significantly more susceptible to SQ infection than females with a prevalence of 90% (n = 20) in males vs 27% (n = 29) in female gerbils. There was no significant difference in the number of adult worms recovered between male and female gerbils for either infection route. No statistically significant gene expression differences were observed in comparisons of worms of the same life stage/sex from male and female gerbils. In subcutaneously infected gerbils, the identification of differentially expressed genes was likely precluded by the markedly different transcript profiles between replicates. However, the transcriptional profiles for IP-infected gerbils were homogenous suggesting that the host sex does not alter nematode gene expression in the life stages examined from the IP model. The lack of impact of host sex on the transcriptome of worms isolated from IP-infected gerbils reinforces the use of male gerbils as the primary rearing host for these parasites. Genome annotation of B. pahangi is reported as it was required for this differential expression analysis.

Indexed as

Brugia pahangiFilariasisGene Expression RegulationGenome, HelminthHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGerbillinaeMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationSex FactorsTranscriptomeBrugia pahangifilariasishost sex effectinfection routetranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID41984800
PMCPMC13261522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.