ArticlePloS one2026
Higher mobility of freshwater mussels in response to unsuitable habitat conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Movement behavior of freshwater invertebrates is largely understudied, although gaining insights into behavioral responses may be crucial to better understand their ecology and to guide their conservation. The objective of this study was to examine whether movement distances and burrowing depths of Unio nanus, a species of the U. crassus complex, and Anodonta spp. would vary between three different habitats (dominated by either U. nanus or Anodonta spp. or in which both species were rare) in a headwater stream in southern Germany within longer (8 weeks) and shorter (48 hours, controlled for substrate) field experiments. We hypothesized that mussels should be the most mobile (i.e., larger locomotion distances) and burrow less in presumably unsuitable habitats where they are rare. Both taxa were most mobile at a sidearm location where both species were rare, and which had the lowest water depth and flow velocity. While U. nanus burrowed significantly deeper at the other faster-flowing sites, burrowing of Anodonta spp. was more variable and did not significantly differ between sites. The results suggest that low water levels may trigger increased mobility in both species, potentially as an adaptation to avoid drying. The stronger behavioral response of U. nanus may reflect its adaptation to more dynamic, lotic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.