Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984794›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Deep learning-based gait phase detection using shank-mounted IMU data: Classification approach.

Wonseok Choi, Mun-Taek Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wonseok ChoiDepartment of Intelligent Robotics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea.
Mun-Taek ChoiDepartment of Intelligent Robotics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-8785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait is a key indicator for assessing an individual's mobility and overall health, and accurate detection of gait cycle phases is essential for precise gait analysis. Most existing gait phase detection approaches rely on multiple wearable sensors, increasing system complexity and limiting real-world applicability. Moreover, rule-based methods, traditional machine learning models, and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approaches often fail to capture complex temporal dependencies, resulting in limited robustness and real-time performance. And approaching gait phase detection as a classification method enables automatic phase recognition directly from sequential signals, simplifying the processing pipeline and supporting stable performance. In this study, we utilized an end-to-end supervised classification learning approach using a state-of-the-art Transformer model. We utilized the publicly available NONAN GaitPrint dataset, time-series gait recordings from 35 healthy young adults who walked along a 200-meter indoor level-ground track, to train deep learning models for gait phase detection. Using the three-axis acceleration and three-axis angular velocity signals from the shank, we trained and evaluated a variety of classification models, including a one-dimensional CNN, a hybrid long short-term memory and gated recurrent unit (Hybrid LSTM+GRU) model, and a Transformer. The results showed that the Transformer model achieved the F1-score of approximately 92.99%, while the CNN and Hybrid LSTM+GRU models demonstrated comparable performance, indicating no substantial differences among the models. These findings demonstrate that clinically and practically feasible gait phase detection can be achieved using shank-mounted IMUs with an end-to-end learning approach.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGaitGait AnalysisAdultClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansLong Short Term MemoryMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41984794
PMCPMC13082664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.