ArticlePloS one2026
On-body measure of reaction time correlates with intoxication level.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced Reaction Time Measurement System Based on 3D Accelerometer in Athletics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Excessive alcohol use has profound effects on individual health and healthcare systems worldwide. Despite this, there is currently no system or device that can detect robustly the physiologic and functional effects of alcohol-based impairment in real-world conditions. A practical, on-body, device capable of rapidly and accurately determining the functional capacity of an individual to drive, before they can start the ignition of the automobile, is required. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate the effect of acute alcohol intoxication on premotor time (PMT) and reaction time (RT), both highly sensitive of individual cognition, as evaluated by the Pison Technology wrist-worn wearable. Nineteen participants (9 male, 10 female) between the ages of 21 and 36 years were recruited for this study, including 14 subjects who consumed alcohol sufficient to raise blood alcohol concentration (BAC) to 0.10-0.12% within a 30-minute period and 5 controls who did not consume alcohol. Changes in reaction time data were correlated with blood alcohol levels as measured by breathalyzer testing, identifying a statistically significant difference between those participants under the legal limit and those over the legal limit (F(3, 3545) = 117, p < 0.001). The results indicated a significant effect of BAC level on reaction time change (Delta RT), Post hoc Tukey tests showed that participants in the medium (M = 104.4; 95% CI, 99.2--109.6) and high (M = 112.7; 95% CI, 107.5--117.9) BAC groups responded significantly slower than controls (M = 72.6; 95% CI, 69.9--75.3; p < 0.05 for both comparisons). The low BAC group (M = 67.5; 95% CI, 65.1--69.9) also differed from controls (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the medium and high BAC groups (p = 0.13). Overall, reaction times increased as BAC levels rose. Both group and individual analyses confirmed that as the BAC increased in subjects, the PMT also increased. The PMT also decreased as the BAC returned to levels under the legal intoxication threshold (0.08%). The effect of BAC on PMT was significant, F(1, 2161) = 156, p < 0.001, with a partial η² of 0.067, indicating a moderate effect size, and a corresponding Cohen's d of approximately 0.52, indicating a medium-sized difference between under-limit and over-limit conditions. This study demonstrated the first use case of an on-body, neuro-physiological sensor capable of detecting sensitive changes of reaction time, in real time, that serves as an easy-to-measure proxy for blood alcohol content and impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.