Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984780›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Unveiling gene perturbation effects through gene regulatory networks inference from single-cell transcriptomic data.

Clelia Corridori, Merrit Romeike, Giorgio Nicoletti, Christa Buecker, Samir Suweis, Sandro Azaele, Graziano Martello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clelia CorridoriDepartment of Biology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Merrit RomeikeMax Perutz Labs, Vienna Biocenter Campus (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Giorgio NicolettiQuantitative Life Sciences Section, The Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste, Italy.
Christa BueckerMax Perutz Labs, Vienna Biocenter Campus (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Samir SuweisDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "G. Galilei", University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Sandro AzaeleDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "G. Galilei", University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Graziano MartelloDepartment of Biology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological and pathological processes are governed by networks of genes called gene regulatory networks (GRNs). By reconstructing GRNs, we can accurately model how cells behave in their natural state and predict how genetic changes will affect them. Transcriptomic data of single cells are now available for a wide range of cellular processes in multiple species. Thus, a method building predictive GRNs from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, without any additional prior knowledge, could have a great impact on our understanding of biological processes and the genes playing a key role in them. To this aim, we developed IGNITE (Inference of Gene Networks using Inverse kinetic Theory and Experiments), an unsupervised machine learning framework designed to infer directed, weighted, and signed GRNs directly from unperturbed single-cell RNA sequencing data. IGNITE uses the GRNs to generate gene expression data upon single and multiple genetic perturbations. IGNITE is based on the inverse problem for a kinetic Ising model, a model from statistical physics that has been successfully applied to biological networks. We tested IGNITE on two complementary systems of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs): murine PSCs transitioning from the naïve to formative states, and human PSCs differentiating toward definitive endoderm. These datasets differ in species, developmental trajectory, and single-cell technology (10X vs. Fluidigm C1), providing a stringent test of generalizability. Using only unperturbed scRNA-seq data, IGNITE simulated single and multiple gene knockouts (KOs) and produced predictions consistent with independent experimental observations. In mouse PSCs, IGNITE generated wild-type data highly correlated with experiments and accurately predicted the effects of Rbpj, Etv5, and triple KOs, while in human PSCs it correctly predicted differentiation-promoting and differentiation-blocking perturbations, in agreement with published studies. These results demonstrate that IGNITE robustly captures gene interaction logic across species and technologies, enabling robust in silico perturbation analyses directly from scRNA-seq data.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiceModels, GeneticSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisUnsupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41984780
PMCPMC13082667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.