ArticlePloS one2026
CrackNet: A novel multi-scale architecture for crack segmentation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crack detection is essential for structural safety inspection but remains challenging due to noise, illumination variations, and complex backgrounds. In this paper, we propose CrackNet, a segmentation network specifically designed for concrete crack detection. CrackNet integrates three key modules: a lightweight multi-scale convolution enhancement block (LightMSCBlock) in the encoder to capture both local details and global context, a SAF attention module embedded in skip connections for scale-aware feature fusion and edge refinement, and a multi-scale feature fusion (MSFF) module in the decoder to enhance feature integration while reducing information loss. Extensive experiments on three public datasets-CFD, Crack500, and DeepCrack-demonstrate that CrackNet consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, on CFD, F1 and IoU improve by 6.37% and 7.1% over SegFormer; on Crack500, F1 increases by 3.86% compared with MobileNetV3-UNet; and on DeepCrack, F1 and IoU gains reach 5.7% and 2.5%, respectively. Ablation studies further confirm the complementary effectiveness of LightMSCBlock, SAF, and MSFF. Overall, CrackNet achieves superior accuracy and robustness, showing strong potential for real-world engineering applications. The code is available at the following link: https://github.com/xzz-ya/CrackNet.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.