Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984775›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Low-toxic and organic solvent-free isolation of RNA.

Romy Böttcher, Thomas Fröhlich, Klaus Förstemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Romy BöttcherGene Center and Dept. of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Feodor-Lynen-Strasse, München, Germany.
Thomas FröhlichGene Center and Dept. of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Feodor-Lynen-Strasse, München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4709-3211
Klaus FörstemannGene Center and Dept. of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Feodor-Lynen-Strasse, München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-6342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA is the central molecule that connects genetic makeup to the function of living cells and organisms. Since genes will also cease to be transcribed, RNA must decay so that the cellular RNA-pool can reflect the current transcriptional state. Undesired degradation is therefore a major challenge when RNA is isolated from living cells, tissues or organisms. Strongly protein-denaturing conditions, often involving toxic organic solvents, are usually employed to quickly inactivate RNases prior to separating nucleic acids from protein. We propose to combine high concentrations of urea, a compound used in fertilizers, with SDS as a non-volatile, low toxicity denaturant. The use of urea and SDS has previously been combined with organic solvent extraction, chaotropic salt-mediated column purification or selective precipitation of long RNA with LiCl. Here, we demonstrate that - akin to the classic alkaline lysis protocol for plasmid preparation - addition of potassium acetate forms insoluble potassium dodecyl sulfate, which can be removed along with denatured proteins and part of the genomic DNA by centrifugation. The RNA is then precipitated with isopropanol, recovering also small non-coding RNAs. We demonstrate that these somewhat crude RNA preparations are nonetheless sufficiently clean to be quantified via classic UV absorption measurements, stable over the time-course of a typical molecular biology reaction and do not harbor inhibitors of reverse transcriptase. While it seems unlikely that we are the first to conceive this simple strategy, we are not aware of any corresponding prior publication.

Indexed as

RNASodium Dodecyl SulfateSolventsUreaRNASodium Dodecyl SulfateSolventsUrea

Identifiers

PMID41984775
PMCPMC13082646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.