ArticlePloS one2026
Acute pain sign recognition by dog owners in a home setting.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify behavioural changes indicative for acute pain in dogs that are recognized by their owners and the wording used to describe these, we asked owners of 51 dogs treated at the Small Animal Clinic of Utrecht University, to document and video tape observed behavioural changes and estimate their dog's level of pain within the first week after clinical discharge. Quantitative data was tested with logistic regression analysis for the predictability of certain behavioural changes to occur at higher owner-estimated pain scores. Owner-recorded videos were analysed independently by three veterinarians to provide a professional reference perspective. Free text entries from participants were analysed qualitatively and the wording used by owners whose dogs were deemed in pain according to the veterinary video evaluation, was extracted. We found that the most often reported behavioural changes on the day of discharge, and on the two days thereafter were: changes in walking (72.1% n = 44/61), playing with an object (70.5%, n = 43/61) and playing with the owner (68.9%, n = 42/61). The empirical data indicated a decrease in, e.g., playing behaviour, explorative behaviour and eating. Logistic regression analyses showed a significant association between owner-estimated pain scores and behavioural changes for these tested items. No correlation was found between pain estimation by the veterinarians and the dog owners. The qualitative text analysis of entries from owners whose dogs were deemed in pain, provided insight into wording used to describe pain-related behavioural changes by owners, that may be used in the context of developing an owner-directed acute pain scoring instrument. Such an instrument is needed to help owners recognize and correctly interpret pain-induced behavioural changes, to ensure adequate pain management and animal welfare after clinical discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.