ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Machine-Learning Microfluidic Minute-Scale Microorganism Metrics Monitoring(M6).
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
On-site monitoring of microorganisms remains challenging because of low concentrations, strong background interference, and dynamic aerosol diffusion, particularly for aerosol-transmitted pathogens. Here, we report a rapid detection platform that integrates a Puri-focusing microfluidic chip, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and machine learning for the analysis of airborne microorganisms. Guided by fluid-dynamic design and laminar-flow focusing, the chip achieved a 95.8% separation efficiency for 5 µm target particles. African swine fever virus (ASFV) was used as a model pathogen. Impedance features, including modulus, real and imaginary components, and phase angle, were extracted from aerosol samples and analyzed using multiple machine learning classifiers. Five-fold cross-validation identified Random Forest (RF) as the optimal model, achieving 95.2% classification accuracy. The platform reached a system-level detection limit of 188 TCID50/mL for air-sampled aerosols and showed high concordance with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results. Each detection cycle required less than 1 minute. This integrated strategy offers a feasible route for rapid on-site monitoring of aerosol-transmitted microorganisms in public health, agriculture, livestock farming, and production safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.