Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984473›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Online Searches for Gun-Related Harm.

Kimberly J Mitchell, Patrick J Guziewicz, Chandler C Carter, Elizabeth A Mumford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kimberly J MitchellCrimes Against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham.
Patrick J GuziewiczCrimes Against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham.
Chandler C CarterNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Elizabeth A MumfordNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Gun violence continues to be a significant public health concern. Access to information about gun-related harm has increased with the advent of social media and websites that host information on this topic. Objective: To provide prevalence estimates of how many adolescents and young adults have conducted online searches for gun-related harm. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included participants recruited from a nationally representative sample from the US through the AmeriSpeak Panel. Eligibility included individual residents who were youths or young adults aged 10 to 34 years old who could speak or read either English or Spanish. Wave 1 data were collected from September 2023 to January 2024, and wave 2 data were collected between September 2024 and February 2025. Data were analyzed from December 2025 to February 2026. Exposures: Social determinants of health and individual experiences hypothesized to increase odd of the main outcome. Main Outcomes and Measures: Searching online for information about "how to kill yourself with a gun"; "how to get a gun or make a gun"; "how to conceal a gun"; and "how to hurt someone else with a gun." Weighted proportions and means with 95% CIs were used for descriptive analyses. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were used to examine demographic characteristics, social determinants of health, personal experiences (eg, experiences of gun violence, gun violence perpetration), and mental health factors associated with intentionally seeking gun-related harm information online for oneself. Results: In this study, 8452 panelists were invited, 5311 completed the baseline survey, and 4039 completed the wave 2 survey (76.1% retention rate). The sample included 4039 participants (mean [SE] age, 23.0 [0.2] years; 1518 male [weighted percentage, 50.6%]). Among respondents, 361 had ever conducted an online search about gun-related harm (weighted percentage, 8.7%). Of these, 102 searched for information about how to kill oneself with a gun (weighted percentage, 2.5%), 175 about how to get a gun or make a gun (weighted percentage, 4.2%), 153 about how to conceal a gun (weighted percentage, 3.5%), and 70 about how to hurt other people with a gun (weighted percentage, 1.7%). Reasons given for searches varied. Overall, intentionally seeking out gun-related harm information online was less likely for females (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.57) and more likely for older participants (aOR, 1.03 per year; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05 per year), those living under poor home conditions (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.38), those who had been exposed to a greater variety of types of gun violence (aOR, 1.20 per exposure; 95% CI, 1.11-1.29 per exposure), and those who had ever had thoughts of suicide (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.47-3.33). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US participants, intentional searches for gun-related harm content were reported by a notable minority of youth and young adults, especially those facing structural disadvantages and mental health distress. Public health strategies that combine digital interventions with structural reforms offer promising avenues to reduce gun-related harm among vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

FirearmsGun ViolenceInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetSocial MediaAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedia ExposureUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41984473
PMCPMC13084454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.