ArticleJAMA psychiatry2026
Prior Trial Effects on Working Memory in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Healthy Control Individuals.
Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Healthy individuals typically show attractive serial dependence in working memory tasks, with responses biased toward recent inputs, whereas people with schizophrenia (SZ) reliably show the opposite-repulsive biases. Determining whether individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) and a history of psychosis exhibit similar or distinct serial-dependence patterns is essential for clarifying shared vs disorder-specific cognitive mechanisms across the psychosis spectrum. Objective: To determine whether people with BD exhibit the repulsive bias seen in people with SZ or the attractive bias seen in healthy control (HC) individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study included individuals who met DSM-5 criteria for SZ or BD with a history of psychosis, along with matched HC participants recruited across 5 US sites. Clinical samples were recruited from outpatient psychiatric clinics and day programs, and HC participants were recruited from the community. A working memory task was used in which participants remembered the orientation of a teardrop-shaped object and reproduced it using a computer mouse after a variable delay. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale was used to quantify symptom severity. The study was conducted from September 2023 to April 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the bias index, used to evaluate the extent to which current-trial responses were biased toward or away from previous-trial targets. Exposures: Diagnostic group and the orientation of the previous trial's target during a spatial working memory paradigm. Results: A total of 41 participants were included in BD group (21 [51%] male; mean [SD] age, 37.02 [11.53] years), 30 in the SZ group (18 [60%] male; mean [SD] age, 37.5 [9.04] years), and 27 in the HC group (16 [59%] male; mean [SD] age, 39.98 [11.01] years). Overall bias differed across groups, with people with SZ (mean, -1.99; 95% CI, -2.74 to 1.23) demonstrating significantly greater repulsive bias than both people with BD (mean, 0.44; 95% CI, -0.25 to 1.13) and HC individuals (mean, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.32). Fifteen of 27 HC individuals exhibited attractive bias, with none showing repulsive bias, whereas 17 of 30 people with SZ exhibited repulsive bias, with none showing attractive bias. Attractive bias was common in people with BD (13 of 41), but some exhibited a repulsive bias (7 of 41). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study, attractive and repulsive serial biases differed between HC individuals and people with SZ, with some people with BD showing the HC pattern and few showing the SZ pattern. These results suggest that serial bias may serve as a valuable biomarker for pathophysiology and precision psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.