Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984431›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2026

Species-specific effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on diaphragm and chest wall geometry in mice, rats, and humans.

Wout J Claassen, Myrte Wennen, Diana Jansen, Annemijn H Jonkman, J Tim Marcus, Gustav J Strijkers, Bram F Coolen, Coen A C Ottenheijm, Leo M A Heunks

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wout J ClaassenDepartment of Physiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5154-7311
Myrte WennenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7749-936X
Diana JansenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Annemijn H JonkmanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Tim MarcusDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9948-6407
Gustav J StrijkersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bram F CoolenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3946-653X
Coen A C OttenheijmDepartment of Physiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8808-4813
Leo M A HeunksDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Role of titin in the pathophysiology of diaphragm weakness during mechanical ventilationR01HL121500 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Coen Ottenheijm · 2014 to 2026
$6.2M
HHS | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) HL121500NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121500ZonMw (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development) 09120011910004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is applied to limit alveolar collapse. However, PEEP will also affect diaphragm geometry and function. Various animal models are used to study the effects of mechanical ventilation on the diaphragm, but chest wall mechanics may influence diaphragm responses to PEEP. We hypothesized that interspecies differences are relevant when studying the effect of PEEP on diaphragm geometry during mechanical ventilation. Specifically, the chest wall compliance, which varies among species, may be an important determinant of the effect of PEEP on diaphragm geometry and function. This is relevant in future studies into diaphragm adaptations during PEEP and particularly in genetically engineered animal models. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we studied the effect of PEEP on diaphragm surface and thorax geometry in ventilated mice, rats, and healthy volunteers. PEEP reduced diaphragm surface in mice, rats, and humans, but the effect was smaller in mice compared with rats. This difference was not attributable to disparities in lung compliance or chest wall compliance. Compared with healthy volunteers, rats showed a larger decrease in diaphragm surface due to greater caudal displacement, whereas mice showed a similar decrease in diaphragm surface, but with more thoracic widening. These findings indicate that the effect of PEEP on diaphragm geometry is influenced by chest wall movement and varies across species. These findings are critical for interpreting diaphragm adaptations to mechanical ventilation in both animal models and patients.

Indexed as

DiaphragmPositive-Pressure RespirationThoracic WallAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, AnimalRatsRats, WistarSpecies SpecificityYoung Adultanimal modelsdiaphragmmechanical ventilationPEEP

Identifiers

PMID41984431
PMCPMC13184903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.