ArticlePain and therapy2026
Buprenorphine Products for the Treatment of Pain: Relative Risk of Abuse and Related Clinical Outcomes Compared to Full μ-Opioid Agonist Medications.
Article in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to utilize real-world data from National Poison Data System (NPDS) to evaluate the relative risk of intentional use and subsequent outcomes following exposures to buprenorphine buccal film (BBF) compared to immediate-release (IR) and extended-release (ER) full agonist opioid (FAO) formulations, and buprenorphine transdermal patch (BTP).
methodsA cross-sectional study design compared exposures that involved BBF to those that involved IR FAO, ER FAO, and BTP using real-world data from NPDS. Data included individuals age 18 years and older involved in exposures managed by US poison centers from 2020 to 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study groups, exposures, and outcomes. Relative risk was calculated for exposure reasons and clinical outcomes using BBF as reference group.
resultsDataset included 276 BBF, 43,322 IR FAO, 2453 ER FAO, and 134 BTP exposures. Compared to BBF, significantly higher risks were found for both IR FAO and ER FAO for intentional abuse, intentional suspected suicide, significant medical outcome, hospital admission, and treated/evaluated and released level of care.
conclusionFindings from this study suggest that, compared to FAO, exposures to BBF managed by US poison centers were less likely to involve intentional abuse or suspected suicide, have a decreased risk of resulting in a life-threatening effect or death, and have a lower likelihood of subsequent hospital admission and emergency department visits. Along with published guidelines and medication labels (including boxed warnings), relative risks of intentional exposures and associated clinical outcomes should be considered when determining opioid therapy for pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.