ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
How meaningfulness and initial learning degree influence associative storage and retrieval processes: A multinomial processing tree and power function analysis.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of meaningfulness and initial learning on memory retention remain debated, largely due to methodological differences and a reliance on observed retention measures that confound underlying storage and retrieval processes. This study investigated how these encoding factors distinctly influence storage and retrieval of associative memory over time. Participants learned noun-noun pairs varying in associative meaningfulness (high, low) and initial learning degree (high, medium, low), followed by free-then-cued recall tests at four retention intervals (35 s, 1 hr, 1 day, 3 days). We employed a two-step modeling approach: a multinomial processing tree (MPT) model isolated storage and retrieval probabilities, and a power forgetting function modeled the time-dependent decay of storage probability. The results revealed that high associative meaningfulness significantly increased storage probability but decreased retrieval probability. Higher initial learning boosted both storage and retrieval processes. Furthermore, the power forgetting function revealed that higher meaningfulness and greater initial learning were associated with a higher initial storage probability and a slower relative forgetting rate. These findings clarify longstanding contradictions by demonstrating that meaningfulness and initial learning have dissociable effects on the latent cognitive processes underlying retention: meaningfulness primarily enhances storage probability but impedes retrieval, whereas initial learning strengthens both processes. Together, these findings provide a deeper understanding of how encoding conditions shape the memory decay over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41984357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.