ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
A Structural Examination of Racial Differences in Pharmacologic Treatment Among Opioid Exposed Infants.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPrevious work has shown racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of pharmacologic treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). This study examined disparities in receipt of screening and diagnosis of NOWS in addition to pharmacologic treatment.
methodsUtilizing electronic health record data from 2016 to 2022 from two large health systems in an urban Midwestern city, Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White infants with birthing parents who had an opioid use diagnosis during pregnancy were sampled (N = 912). Data were analyzed using chi-squares, t-tests, and logistic regression analyses. Screening is defined as receipt of a Finnegan score, and Severe Finnegan score was defined as 2 scores ≥8 or 1 score ≥12.
resultsNon-Hispanic Black infants had 59% reduced odds of receiving a Finnegan score [95%CI OR = 0.41 (0.21,0.78)]. We observe no significant difference in receipt of a NOWS diagnosis by race/ethnicity after controlling for receipt of a Finnegan score. Conditional on being screened, Non-Hispanic Black infants had 58% reduced odds of receiving a severe Finnegan score [95%CI OR = 0.42 (0.23,0.76)] relative to Non-Hispanic White infants. In models controlling for receipt of a severe Finnegan score and a NOWS diagnosis, Non-Hispanic Black infants did not have significantly different odds of receiving pharmacologic treatment.
conclusionBlack infants with prenatal opioid exposure were screened for NOWS less often and had reduced odds of receiving a severe Finnegan score than their Non-Hispanic White counterparts. Screening and scoring inequities may contribute to downstream differences in pharmacologic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41984334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.