ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
Multi-site distributed training with data protections for PET-based synthetic CT.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate PET quantification relies on attenuation correction (AC), commonly performed using a linear attenuation map derived from a CT acquisition. However, CT can introduce misregistration artifacts and adds radiation dose. Synthetic CT (sCT) from non-attenuation corrected (NAC) PET offers a CT-less alternative, but training robust models requires multi-site data that may be difficult to share under privacy regulations. We aim to enable PET-based sCT training across sites without exposing data.
methodsWe built a federated learning (FL) framework and trained two sCT generators–a paired conditional GAN and a CycleGAN. Models were pretrained on a single-site cohort (Site 1, n = 425) and fine-tuned via FL using additional data from Site 1 (n = 25) and a second site with different scanners and reconstruction parameters (Site 2, n = 25). Performance was assessed on an internal hold-out set (Site 1, n = 91) and two external cohorts (Sites 3,4; n = 11, 10) using region-wise relative mean error (rME) of SUV in AC PET.
resultsBoth models produced anatomically plausible sCT and AC PET with low errors when test data matched training distributions. FL fine-tuning improved robustness under distribution shift at Site 3, reducing errors across most regions, while maintaining comparable performance at Site 4 where protocols resembled the pretraining site.
conclusionMulti-site FL is a feasible path to increase the generalizability of PET-based sCT while preserving data privacy. The proposed framework offers a practical template for training and deploying CT-less AC models across heterogeneous clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.