Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984303›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Top-down motivation both decreases and increases feature interference following a saccade.

Tzu-Yao Chiu, Julie D Golomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tzu-Yao ChiuDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. chiu.315@osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-2829
Julie D GolombDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-0702

Funding

Neural and perceptual mechanisms of spatial stability across eye movementsR01EY025648 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie D Golomb · 2015 to 2026
$4.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial attention is rarely static, but instead highly dynamic in real-life. Recent studies have revealed that shifts of attention and eye movements incur consequences for ongoing feature perception, such as systematic feature-binding (swapping and mixing) errors. Here we investigated if these consequences are sensitive to top-down control, such that they could be flexibly mitigated when participants are motivated to improve their performance, or if feature interference reflects a more automatic byproduct of attentional remapping mechanisms following a saccade. In a preregistered experiment, 40 healthy adults reported the color of an item appearing at a pre-cued spatiotopic location. Following the cue, participants made a saccade, and then an array of colored items briefly appeared at the spatiotopic target location, retinotopic nontarget location, and two control nontarget locations. Crucially, across blocks we provided two different levels of performance-contingent reward (monetary incentives for precise spatiotopic target reports) to induce differences in top-down motivation. Compared to baseline lower-reward blocks, during higher performance-contingent reward ("bonus") blocks, participants showed improved general performance and reduced subtle retinotopic mixing errors immediately after the saccade. However, we found the opposite effect on retinotopic swapping errors, with higher reward/motivation associated with increased retinotopic swapping errors early after the saccade, indicating that retinotopic swapping errors may reflect a structural limitation of the attentional remapping process. Overall, these results uncover effects of motivation on distinct attentional mechanisms underlying spatial remapping across saccades, and provide novel insights into the role of top-down control in dynamic spatial attention and visual perception more generally.

Indexed as

AttentionMotivationPsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesSpace PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleRewardYoung AdultDynamic attentionFeature interferenceMotivationRemapping

Identifiers

PMID41984303
PMCPMC13083521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.