ReviewJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Evaluating Culturally Adapted Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods Review.
Review in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This mixed methods review aimed to identify and evaluate studies that developed and assessed culturally adapted cardiac rehabilitation programmes for ethnic minority patients. Ethnic minorities face several barriers when attending cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Culturally sensitive cardiac education programmes exist and provide evidence of their value. There is a need for review-based research to collate current understanding and evaluate the studies and outcomes. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review providing additional insight into the impact of culturally adapted cardiac rehabilitation programmes on ethnic minority patients. A convergent segregated mixed methods review was undertaken and reported according to JBI methodology. A systematic search was conducted by two blind reviewers assisted by Covidence© software. Nine electronic databases were searched including; Amed, CINAHL Plus, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science from inception to June 2025. Studies were included if they designed interventions for and included adult ethnic minority patients and report on culturally tailored interventions any outcomes related to the tailored cardiac rehabilitation programme. Any type of design was acceptable including mixed methods, qualitative or qualitative. Critical appraisal, narrative synthesis and certainty assessment of evidence was undertaken to summarise findings. Six studies met the inclusion criteria (3 qualitative, 2 mixed methods, 1 quantitative). Overall study quality was moderate. Cultural adaptations with moderate confidence in benefits included community collaboration, bilingual or culturally matched staff and single-sex classes. Findings suggest culturally adapted cardiac rehabilitation is received positively, with potential to improve physical, social and mental wellbeing among ethnic patients. Culturally adapted cardiac rehabilitation may support engagement and improve health outcomes for ethnic patients, however further high-quality research is needed to confirm effectiveness and guide service development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41984299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.