Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41984296›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026

Evolution of community pharmacy services in the European Union and beyond: a cross-country survey of 33 national pharmacy organisations.

Jorge P B Batista, Anita Elaine Weidmann, Erika Mallarini, Martin C Henman, Ilaria Passarani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorge P B BatistaPharmaceutical Group of the European Union (PGEU), Brussels, Belgium. jorge.batista@pgeu.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1140-5869
Anita Elaine WeidmannUniversität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3670-2357
Erika MallariniSDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy.
Martin C HenmanTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7922-7691
Ilaria PassaraniPharmaceutical Group of the European Union (PGEU), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunity pharmacy practice in Europe has evolved, expanding beyond dispensing roles to include preventive, counselling, and clinical services. However, evidence on the implementation, reimbursement, and regulation of these services across the European Union (EU) remains limited, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding these developments is crucial to inform workforce planning, funding frameworks, and the integration of pharmacists into primary care. With limited healthcare resources, investing in pharmacy-based public health interventions leverages pharmacies' accessibility, geographic distribution, trusted patient relationships, and skilled workforce.

aimThis study aimed to update the mapping of community pharmacy services (CPS) across Europe, comparing 2025 data with pre-pandemic (2020) findings, and to examine trends in service provision, reimbursement, and regulatory barriers from a health policy perspective.

methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted among national pharmacy associations in all 27 EU Member States and six neighbouring countries (n = 33), to contextualise EU findings within the wider European pharmacy practice landscape. A previously validated instrument was used to collect data on 47 CPS, including implementation level and reimbursement status. Responses were validated through national review, and data were analysed descriptively and compared with 2020 results.

resultsAcross the 33 countries, a median of 26 services per country was reported (range: 9-43). Using a consistent data collection instrument and methodology, 77% (n = 36) of mapped CPS were available in a greater number of countries in 2025 than in 2020. Notable growth was observed in vaccination (10-19 countries), medication reconciliation (7-15), and first-time dispensing interventions (11-16). Public reimbursement increased for 49% (n = 23) of services between 2020 and 2025, with the largest increases in vaccination (+ 5 countries), screening (+ 4 countries), and dose administration aids (+ 3 countries). Despite this progress, variation between countries persists, alongside regulatory and operational barriers (remuneration, workforce capacity and interprofessional integration).

conclusionSince 2020, CPS have expanded across Europe, with wider availability and, in some cases, progression from pilots or individual provision to national implementation. Wider and more sustainable implementation appears to depend on supportive regulatory frameworks and public remuneration.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPharmacistsCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeEuropean UnionHumansProfessional RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity pharmacyCommunity pharmacy servicesEuropeHealth policyReimbursementService implementation

Identifiers

PMID41984296
PMCPMC13369040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.